linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] i2c: xiic: fix indentation issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:08:27 +0000
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] i2c: xiic: fix indentation issue

On 2020-01-27 10:26, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 27/01/2020 07:43, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 26. 01. 20 16:42, Colin King wrote:
>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>>
>>> There is a statment that is indented one level too deeply, remove
>>
>> typo             ^
> 
> Can this be fixed when the patch is applied rather than sending a V2?

It can, but I think you will make it easier for Wolfram if you send a v2.
Which is the right thing to do anyway since you are missing a Fixes tag.
I think you should have one, since it is borderline if this patch is going
to make it before 5.6.

Cheers,
Peter

> Colin
> 
>>
>>> the extraneous tab.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
>>> index b17d30c9ab40..90c1c362394d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
>>> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int xiic_clear_rx_fifo(struct xiic_i2c *i2c)
>>>  		xiic_getreg8(i2c, XIIC_DRR_REG_OFFSET);
>>>  		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
>>>  			dev_err(i2c->dev, "Failed to clear rx fifo\n");
>>> -				return -ETIMEDOUT;
>>> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
>>>  		}
>>>  	}
>>
>> When fixed.
>>
>> Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Michal
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>