[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200127023052.87188-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 02:30:51 +0000
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
To: boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
dvhart@...radead.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] futex: Add missing annotation to wake_futex_pi()
Sparse reprts warnings;
warning: context imbalance in wake_futex_pi() - unexpected unlock
warning: context imbalance in futex_unlock_p() - different lock contexts
for basic block
The root cause is a missing annotation at wake_futex_pi()
which also causes the "different lock contexts for basic block" warning.
To fix these,
a __releases(&pi_state) annotation is added to wake_futex_pi().
Given that wake_futex_pi() does actually call
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock) at exit,
this fixes the warnings
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
---
kernel/futex.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 0cf84c8664f2..dfcb90b47ed6 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1549,7 +1549,8 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
/*
* Caller must hold a reference on @pi_state.
*/
-static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
+static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval,
+ struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) __releases(&pi_state)
{
u32 uninitialized_var(curval), newval;
struct task_struct *new_owner;
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists