linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next][V2] i2c: xiic: fix indentation issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200127120535.GC1847@kadam>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:05:35 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next][V2] i2c: xiic: fix indentation issue

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 27. 01. 20 11:23, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > 
> > There is a statement that is indented one level too deeply, remove
> > the extraneous tab.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > ---
> > V2: fix type in commit message
> > ---
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
> > index b17d30c9ab40..90c1c362394d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
> > @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int xiic_clear_rx_fifo(struct xiic_i2c *i2c)
> >  		xiic_getreg8(i2c, XIIC_DRR_REG_OFFSET);
> >  		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> >  			dev_err(i2c->dev, "Failed to clear rx fifo\n");
> > -				return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > 
> 
> As was suggested by Peter you should also add Fixes: <sha1> ("patch
> subject")
> 

It's not really a bugfix, it's just a cleanup.

regards,
dan carpenter