linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V2 0/5] soc: imx: increase build coverage for imx8 soc driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 12:33:49 +0000
From:   Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
        Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
        Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
        "krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 0/5] soc: imx: increase build coverage for imx8 soc
 driver

Hi Arnd,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] soc: imx: increase build coverage for imx8 soc
> driver
> 
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:44 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> >
> > V2:
> >  Include Leonard's patch to fix build break after enable compile test
> > Add Leonard's R-b tag
> >
> > Rename soc-imx8.c to soc-imx8m.c which is for i.MX8M family Add
> > SOC_IMX8M for build gate soc-imx8m.c Increase build coverage for i.MX
> > SoC driver
> 
> The changes all look good to me, but I'd just do it all in one combined patch, as
> the changes are all logically part of the same thing. You can leave Leonard's fix
> as a [PATCH 1/2]  if you want, but the rest should clearly be a single change.

There is a arm64 defconfig change, should it be also included in the single change?

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
>       Arnd