lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJHYwH28jkg4h0GivOz=GywxFkGpxLywt9HEqKy3pdVRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:56:11 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc:     "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: spi: Document binding for generic SPI multiplexer

On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 2:24 PM Chris Packham
<Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 07:51 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:24 PM Chris Packham
> > <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add binding documentation for the spi-mux driver. This allows a generic
> > > multiplexer to be used to provide access to multiple SPI devices.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Notes:
> > >     Changes in v2:
> > >     - update license
> > >     - make dt_binding_check clean
> >
> > Sure about that?
> >
>
> I was when I wrote that, but now I think I need to consult my spell
> book.
>
> It appears the incantation I should be using is
>
>   make ARCH=arm defconfig
>   make ARCH=arm dt_binding_check \
>      DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-mux.yaml

Note that you need to run this also without DT_SCHEMA_FILES set so the
example is checked against all schema. With that, the 'spi' node is
going to need #address-cells and #size-cells.

>
> I can see the simple failures (not sure how I missed them). But one
> that remains is:
>
> Warning (spi_bus_bridge): /example-0/spi/spi-mux@0: node name for SPI
> buses should be 'spi'
>
> I could fix that by having
>
>  spi {
>     spi@0 {
>        compatible = "spi-mux";
>     };
>  };
>
> Is that what we want? Or should I be adding awareness of spi-muxes to
> dtc?

We should probably relax dtc, but for now I'd just use 'spi'.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ