[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200127153647.GA32343@bogus>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:36:47 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Akash Gajjar <akash@...nedev.com>
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, jagan@...nedev.com,
Akash Gajjar <akash@...nedev.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Alexis Ballier <aballier@...too.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Nick Xie <nick@...das.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
Markus Reichl <m.reichl@...etechno.de>,
Vivek Unune <npcomplete13@...il.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4, 1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: add ROCK Pi S DTS support
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:01:37 +0530, Akash Gajjar wrote:
> ROCK Pi S is RK3308 based SBC from radxa.com. ROCK Pi S has a,
> - 256MB/512MB DDR3 RAM
> - SD, NAND flash (optional on board 1/2/4/8Gb)
> - 100MB ethernet, PoE (optional)
> - Onboard 802.11 b/g/n wifi + Bluetooth 4.0 Module
> - USB2.0 Type-A HOST x1
> - USB3.0 Type-C OTG x1
> - 26-pin expansion header
> - USB Type-C DC 5V Power Supply
>
> This patch enables
> - Console
> - NAND Flash
> - SD Card
>
> Signed-off-by: Akash Gajjar <akash@...nedev.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4
> - remove supports-sd/sdio, nums-slots property
> - use vmmc-supply for emmc node
>
> Changes in v3
> - Use small S on dts file name
> - Add missing semicolon
> - Remove USB2.0 node support
>
> Changes in v2
> - Use pwm-supply for vdd_core node instead of vi-supply
> - Add USB2.0 node support
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 5 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3308-rock-pi-s.dts | 216 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 222 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3308-rock-pi-s.dts
>
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists