lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:49:48 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:     'linux-kernel' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched/fair: Long delays starting RT processes on idle cpu.

On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:39:24 +0000
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:

> I'd have thought that the processor should wake up much faster than that.
> I can't see the memory write that is paired with the monitor/mwait.
> Does it need a strong barrier?

You may want to prevent the CPU from going into a deep C state. 90us is
something I would expect if the CPU is in a deep C state (I've seen
much longer wake up times due to deep C state).

Boot the kernel with idle=poll and see if you can trigger the same
latency. If not, then you know it's the CPU going into a deep C state
that is causing your latency.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ