linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent issue)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:55:53 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        acme@...nel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent
 issue)

On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:34:23 +0100
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Steven and Masami,
> 
> thanks for the patch, it fixes this issue!

Thanks for letting me know. I'll add a:

  Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>

to the commit.

> 
> PS: I should have sent this description earlier, would have saved a week of debugging
> on my side....

Heh, I do things like this ofter after triggering bugs in others
code, and will spend a few days debugging it, then finding out that
there's already a fix to the bug I find (or presenting the problem
gives a proper fix). I just calk it up as a learning experience ;-)

-- Steve