linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: clarify limitations of hibernation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:14:09 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...gle.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Geoff Pike <gpike@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: clarify limitations of hibernation

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:16 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri 24-01-20 08:37:12, Luigi Semenzato wrote:
> [...]
> > The purpose of my documentation patch was to make it clearer that
> > hibernation may fail in situations in which suspend-to-RAM works; for
> > instance, when there is no swap, and anonymous pages are over 50% of
> > total RAM.  I will send a new version of the patch which hopefully
> > makes this clearer.
>
> I was under impression that s2disk is pretty much impossible without any
> swap.

And you were correct. :-)