lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200127162222.GG1114818@krava>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:22:22 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools lib api fs: Move cgroupsfs_find_mountpoint()

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:58:27PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:12 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 07:00:31PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > -
> > > -     if (strlen(path) < maxlen) {
> > > -             strcpy(buf, path);
> > > -             return 0;
> > > -     }
> > > -     return -1;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  static int open_cgroup(const char *name)
> > >  {
> > >       char path[PATH_MAX + 1];
> > > @@ -79,7 +20,7 @@ static int open_cgroup(const char *name)
> > >       int fd;
> > >
> > >
> > > -     if (cgroupfs_find_mountpoint(mnt, PATH_MAX + 1))
> > > +     if (cgroupfs_find_mountpoint(mnt, PATH_MAX + 1, "perf_event"))
> >
> > nice, but could you please follow fs API names and change the
> > name to cgroupfs__mountpoint
> >
> > I think we don't need to define the rest of the functions now,
> > if they are not used
> >
> >         #define FS(name)                                \
> >                 const char *name##__mountpoint(void);   \
> >                 const char *name##__mount(void);        \
> >                 bool name##__configured(void);          \
> >
> > just follow the function name
> 
> I thought about it too, but still it has different arguments.
> So I left it as is... Do you really want to rename?

yea I think we should keep the same name, Arnaldo?

jirka

> 
> Thanks
> Namhyung
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ