[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87e6b531-3596-4523-a6b0-629ae8fd6995@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:50:31 -0800
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ima: support calculating the boot_aggregate based on
different TPM banks
On 1/27/2020 8:01 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) {
> + if (ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id == d.alg_id)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (i == ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks)
> + d.alg_id = ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[0].alg_id;
> +
Can the number of allocated banks (ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks) be
zero? Should that be checked before accessing "allocated_banks"?
-lakshmi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists