linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86/microcode for 5.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgedtBiFok8twm499FmNCJ6icWdG7Deb7f4jcDYS4Y_Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:21:45 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:     x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/microcode for 5.6

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:39 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
>
> please pull another boring branch this time around:

No problem with boring, but I'm trying to figure out why one of your
three pulls had a signed tag, and the other two didn't?

Is it just that the shared tip tree doesn't use tags, or what?

             Linus