linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH liburing 0/1] test: add epoll test case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200127180028.f7s5xhhizii3dsnr@steredhat>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 19:00:28 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing 0/1] test: add epoll test case

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 09:26:41AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/27/20 9:17 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> > I wrote the test case for epoll.
> > 
> > Since it fails also without sqpoll (Linux 5.4.13-201.fc31.x86_64),
> > can you take a look to understand if the test is wrong?
> > 
> > Tomorrow I'll travel, but on Wednesday I'll try this test with the patch
> > that I sent and also with the upstream kernel.
> 
> I'll take a look, but your patches are coming through garbled and don't
> apply.

Weird, I'm using git-publish as usual. I tried to download the patch
received from the ML, and I tried to reapply and it seams to work here.

Which kind of issue do you have? (just to fix my setup)

Anyway I pushed my tree here:
    https://github.com/stefano-garzarella/liburing.git epoll