[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1580150148.5088.41.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:35:48 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate
the boot aggregate
On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 13:16 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 17:38 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: linux-integrity-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity-
> > > owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mimi Zohar
> > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 5:02 PM
> > > To: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>; James Bottomley
> > > <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>; linux-
> > > kernel@...r.kernel.org; Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate the
> > > boot aggregate
> >
> > Hi Mimi
> >
> > I did a similar change (patch 8/8) in the patch set I just sent. The patch is simpler,
> > as it reuses the data structures I introduced in the previous patches. Let me know
> > if I can keep this part in my patch set or I should remove it.
>
> Only 2/2 "ima: support calculating the boot_aggregate based on
> different TPM banks" is really needed to address Jerry's bug report.
> Let's review your patch set before making any decisions about 1/2
> "ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate the boot
> aggregate".
To be more precise, we need to be able to backport the bug fix. So
the change needs to be independent of anything you're defining now.
Changes/improvements can be made on top of the bug fix.
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists