lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:59:48 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     "Kammela, Gayatri" <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>
Cc:     Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Somayaji, Vishwanath" <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        "Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Prestopine, Charles D" <charles.d.prestopine@...el.com>,
        "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Box, David E" <david.e.box@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs entries

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:03 PM Kammela, Gayatri
<gayatri.kammela@...el.com> wrote:

> > It doesn't apply to our for-next branch.
> Sorry to hear that. I've rebased the series on mainline 5.5-rc7. Should I rebase it on for-next branch?

You should always base your branch on the for-next (whatever it's
being called) of the subsystem your series against of.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ