linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dynamically allocate struct cpumask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:09:36 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dynamically allocate struct cpumask

On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 11:16:02PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> This helps avoid avoid a potentially large stack allocation.
> 
> When building with:
> $ make CC=clang arch/x86/ CFLAGS=-Wframe-larger-than=1000
> The following warning is observed:
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c:494:13: warning: stack frame size of 1064 bytes in
> function 'kvm_send_ipi_mask_allbutself' [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> static void kvm_send_ipi_mask_allbutself(const struct cpumask *mask, int
> vector)
>             ^
> Debugging with:
> https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/frame-larger-than
> via:
> $ python3 frame_larger_than.py arch/x86/kernel/kvm.o \
>   kvm_send_ipi_mask_allbutself
> points to the stack allocated `struct cpumask newmask` in
> `kvm_send_ipi_mask_allbutself`. The size of a `struct cpumask` is
> potentially large, as it's CONFIG_NR_CPUS divided by BITS_PER_LONG for
> the target architecture. CONFIG_NR_CPUS for X86_64 can be as high as
> 8192, making a single instance of a `struct cpumask` 1024 B.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> index 32ef1ee733b7..d41c0a0d62a2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> @@ -494,13 +494,15 @@ static void kvm_send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
>  static void kvm_send_ipi_mask_allbutself(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
>  {
>  	unsigned int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -	struct cpumask new_mask;

Right, on stack cpumask is definitely dodgy.

> +	struct cpumask *new_mask;
>  	const struct cpumask *local_mask;
>  
> -	cpumask_copy(&new_mask, mask);
> -	cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, &new_mask);
> -	local_mask = &new_mask;
> +	new_mask = kmalloc(sizeof(*new_mask), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	cpumask_copy(new_mask, mask);
> +	cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, new_mask);
> +	local_mask = new_mask;
>  	__send_ipi_mask(local_mask, vector);
> +	kfree(new_mask);
>  }

One alternative approach is adding the inverse of cpu_bit_bitmap. I'm
not entirely sure how often we need the all-but-self mask, but ISTR
there were other places too.