[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200128135824.702029064@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 15:00:12 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 051/104] XArray: Fix xa_find_after with multi-index entries
From: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
commit 19c30f4dd0923ef191f35c652ee4058e91e89056 upstream.
If the entry is of an order which is a multiple of XA_CHUNK_SIZE,
the current detection of sibling entries does not work. Factor out
an xas_sibling() function to make xa_find_after() a little more
understandable, and write a new implementation that doesn't suffer from
the same bug.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
lib/test_xarray.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
lib/xarray.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/test_xarray.c
+++ b/lib/test_xarray.c
@@ -902,28 +902,30 @@ static noinline void check_store_iter(st
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
-static noinline void check_multi_find(struct xarray *xa)
+static noinline void check_multi_find_1(struct xarray *xa, unsigned order)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
+ unsigned long multi = 3 << order;
+ unsigned long next = 4 << order;
unsigned long index;
- xa_store_order(xa, 12, 2, xa_mk_value(12), GFP_KERNEL);
- XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, 16, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
+ xa_store_order(xa, multi, order, xa_mk_value(multi), GFP_KERNEL);
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, next, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
index = 0;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT) !=
- xa_mk_value(12));
- XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != 12);
- index = 13;
+ xa_mk_value(multi));
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != multi);
+ index = multi + 1;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT) !=
- xa_mk_value(12));
- XA_BUG_ON(xa, (index < 12) || (index >= 16));
+ xa_mk_value(multi));
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, (index < multi) || (index >= next));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find_after(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT) !=
- xa_mk_value(16));
- XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != 16);
+ xa_mk_value(next));
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != next);
- xa_erase_index(xa, 12);
- xa_erase_index(xa, 16);
+ xa_erase_index(xa, multi);
+ xa_erase_index(xa, next);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
#endif
}
@@ -1064,11 +1066,15 @@ static noinline void check_find_4(struct
static noinline void check_find(struct xarray *xa)
{
+ unsigned i;
+
check_find_1(xa);
check_find_2(xa);
check_find_3(xa);
check_find_4(xa);
- check_multi_find(xa);
+
+ for (i = 2; i < 10; i++)
+ check_multi_find_1(xa, i);
check_multi_find_2(xa);
}
--- a/lib/xarray.c
+++ b/lib/xarray.c
@@ -1824,6 +1824,17 @@ void *xa_find(struct xarray *xa, unsigne
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xa_find);
+static bool xas_sibling(struct xa_state *xas)
+{
+ struct xa_node *node = xas->xa_node;
+ unsigned long mask;
+
+ if (!node)
+ return false;
+ mask = (XA_CHUNK_SIZE << node->shift) - 1;
+ return (xas->xa_index & mask) > (xas->xa_offset << node->shift);
+}
+
/**
* xa_find_after() - Search the XArray for a present entry.
* @xa: XArray.
@@ -1858,13 +1869,8 @@ void *xa_find_after(struct xarray *xa, u
entry = xas_find(&xas, max);
if (xas.xa_node == XAS_BOUNDS)
break;
- if (xas.xa_shift) {
- if (xas.xa_index & ((1UL << xas.xa_shift) - 1))
- continue;
- } else {
- if (xas.xa_offset < (xas.xa_index & XA_CHUNK_MASK))
- continue;
- }
+ if (xas_sibling(&xas))
+ continue;
if (!xas_retry(&xas, entry))
break;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists