[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86c5b26b-ae03-01ba-8735-ee37647b3d48@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:22:02 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Daurnimator <quae@...rnimator.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: add io-wq workqueue sharing
On 1/27/20 5:15 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> @@ -6577,7 +6613,11 @@ static long io_uring_setup(u32 entries, struct io_uring_params __user *params)
>
> if (p.flags & ~(IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL | IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL |
> IORING_SETUP_SQ_AFF | IORING_SETUP_CQSIZE |
> - IORING_SETUP_CLAMP))
> + IORING_SETUP_CLAMP | IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* wq_fd isn't valid without ATTACH_WQ being set */
> + if (!(p.flags & IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ) && p.wq_fd)
> return -EINVAL;
Since we're now using file descriptors, this no longer works. Any values
(outside of -1) is fair game.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists