linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] soc: Add a basic ACPI generic driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200128115629.GB2680602@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:56:29 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, jeremy.linton@....com,
        arnd@...db.de, olof@...om.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, guohanjun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] soc: Add a basic ACPI generic driver

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 07:14:19PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> Add a generic driver for platforms which populate their ACPI PPTT
> processor package ID Type Structure according to suggestion in the ACPI
> spec - see ACPI 6.2, section 5.2.29.3 ID structure Type 2.
> 
> The soc_id is from member LEVEL_2_ID.
> 
> For this, we need to use a whitelist of platforms which are known to
> populate the structure as suggested.
> 
> For now, only the vendor and soc_id fields are exposed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/Makefile       |   1 +
>  drivers/soc/acpi_generic.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/acpi_generic.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Makefile b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> index 8b49d782a1ab..2a59a30a22cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>  # Makefile for the Linux Kernel SOC specific device drivers.
>  #
>  
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT)		+= acpi_generic.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ACTIONS)	+= actions/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_ASPEED)	+= aspeed/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91)		+= atmel/
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/acpi_generic.c b/drivers/soc/acpi_generic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..34a1f5f8e063
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/acpi_generic.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) John Garry, john.garry@...wei.com
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "SOC ACPI GENERIC: " fmt

You have a device, why do you need pr_fmt()?

> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Known platforms that fill in PPTT package ID structures according to
> + * ACPI spec examples, that being:
> + * - Custom driver attribute is in ID Type Structure VENDOR_ID member
> + * - SoC id is in ID Type Structure LEVEL_2_ID member
> + *    See ACPI SPEC 6.2 Table 5-154 for PPTT ID Type Structure
> + */
> +static struct acpi_platform_list plat_list[] = {
> +	{"HISI  ", "HIP08   ", 0, ACPI_SIG_PPTT, all_versions},
> +	{ } /* End */
> +};
> +
> +struct acpi_generic_soc_struct {
> +	struct soc_device_attribute dev_attr;
> +	u32 vendor;
> +};
> +
> +static ssize_t vendor_show(struct device *dev,
> +			   struct device_attribute *attr,
> +			   char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_generic_soc_struct *soc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	u8 vendor_id[5] = {};
> +
> +	*(u32 *)vendor_id = soc->vendor;
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", vendor_id);
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(vendor);
> +
> +static __init int soc_acpi_generic_init(void)
> +{
> +	int index;
> +
> +	index = acpi_match_platform_list(plat_list);
> +	if (index < 0)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	index = 0;
> +	while (true) {
> +		struct acpi_pptt_package_info info;
> +
> +		if (!acpi_pptt_get_package_info(index, &info)) {
> +			struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> +			struct acpi_generic_soc_struct *soc;
> +			struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> +			u8 soc_id[9] = {};
> +
> +			*(u64 *)soc_id = info.LEVEL_2_ID;
> +
> +			soc = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc), GFP_KERNEL);
> +			if (!soc)
> +				return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +			soc_dev_attr = &soc->dev_attr;
> +			soc_dev_attr->soc_id = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s",
> +							 soc_id);
> +			if (!soc_dev_attr->soc_id) {
> +				kfree(soc);
> +				return -ENOMEM;
> +			}
> +			soc->vendor = info.vendor_id;
> +
> +			soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
> +			if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
> +				int ret = PTR_ERR(soc_dev);
> +
> +				pr_info("could not register soc (%d) index=%d\n",
> +					ret, index);

pr_err()?

And shouldn't the core print out the error, not the person who calls it?


> +				kfree(soc_dev_attr->soc_id);
> +				kfree(soc);
> +				return ret;
> +			}
> +			dev_set_drvdata(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev), soc);
> +			device_create_file(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev),
> +					   &dev_attr_vendor);

You just raced with userspace and lost.  Use the built-in api that I
made _just_ because of SOC drivers to do this correctly.

thanks,

greg k-h