linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 083/271] drm/nouveau/pmu: dont print reply values if exec is false

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jan 2020 15:03:52 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 083/271] drm/nouveau/pmu: dont print reply values if exec is false

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

[ Upstream commit b1d03fc36ec9834465a08c275c8d563e07f6f6bf ]

Currently the uninitialized values in the array reply are printed out
when exec is false and nvkm_pmu_send has not updated the array. Avoid
confusion by only dumping out these values if they have been actually
updated.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1271291 ("Uninitialized scaler variable")
Fixes: ebb58dc2ef8c ("drm/nouveau/pmu: rename from pwr (no binary change)")

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
index e6f74168238c7..2ef9e942f43a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
@@ -87,10 +87,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec)
 	if (exec) {
 		nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC,
 			      memx->base, finish);
+		nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n",
+			   reply[0], reply[1]);
 	}
 
-	nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n",
-		   reply[0], reply[1]);
 	kfree(memx);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.20.1