[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200129103640.GA668562@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:36:40 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, x86@...nel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Steven Price <Steven.Price@....com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <Anshuman.Khandual@....com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@...dia.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12] mm/debug: Add tests validating architecture page
table helpers
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 02:07:10PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2020, at 12:47 PM, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> > The primary goal here is not finding regressions but having clearly
> > defined semantics of the page table accessors across architectures. x86
> > and arm64 are a good starting point and other architectures will be
> > enabled as they are aligned to the same semantics.
>
> This still does not answer the fundamental question. If this test is
> simply inefficient to find bugs,
Who said this is inefficient (other than you)?
> who wants to spend time to use it regularly?
Arch maintainers, mm maintainers introducing new macros or assuming
certain new semantics of the existing macros.
> If this is just one off test that may get running once in a few years
> (when introducing a new arch), how does it justify the ongoing cost to
> maintain it?
You are really missing the point. It's not only for a new arch but
changes to existing arch code. And if the arch code churn in this area
is relatively small, I'd expect a similarly small cost of maintaining
this test.
If you only turn DEBUG_VM on once every few years, don't generalise this
to the rest of the kernel developers (as others pointed out, this test
is default y if DEBUG_VM).
Anyway, I think that's a pointless discussion, so not going to reply
further (unless you have technical content to add).
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists