[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200129132427.bg774jfgbvm33s5w@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:24:27 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] console: Drop double check for console_drivers
being non-NULL
On Mon 2020-01-27 13:47:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> There is no need to explicitly check for console_drivers to be non-NULL
> since for_each_console() does this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Nice catch.
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
There is a candidate for another patch, see the note below.
> ---
> v3: no changes
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 16 ++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index fada22dc4ab6..51337ed426e0 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -2653,18 +2650,17 @@ void register_console(struct console *newcon)
> struct console_cmdline *c;
> static bool has_preferred;
>
> - if (console_drivers)
> - for_each_console(bcon)
> - if (WARN(bcon == newcon,
> - "console '%s%d' already registered\n",
> - bcon->name, bcon->index))
> - return;
> + for_each_console(bcon) {
> + if (WARN(bcon == newcon, "console '%s%d' already registered\n",
> + bcon->name, bcon->index))
> + return;
> + }
>
> /*
> * before we register a new CON_BOOT console, make sure we don't
> * already have a valid console
> */
> - if (console_drivers && newcon->flags & CON_BOOT) {
> + if (newcon->flags & CON_BOOT) {
> /* find the last or real console */
Note: This comment is misleading. I would just remove it.
> for_each_console(bcon) {
> if (!(bcon->flags & CON_BOOT)) {
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists