lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200129132540.GA11384@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:25:41 +0100
From:   Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc:     linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] cgroup: unify attach permission checking

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:48:39PM +0100, Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com> wrote:
> +static int cgroup_attach_permissions(struct cgroup *src_cgrp,
> +				     struct cgroup *dst_cgrp,
> +				     struct super_block *sb, bool thread)
I suggest inverting the logic of the last argument to make it consistent
with other functions that use threadgroup argument for similar
distinction.

Apart from that
Acked-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ