[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f2b98a1dae3bc737a43a1e46255657b@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:35:21 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
georgi.djakov@...aro.org, saravanak@...gle.com, nm@...com,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, dianders@...omium.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 09/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add cpu OPP tables
Hey Matthias,
Thanks for the review!
On 2020-01-29 06:54, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Sibi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 01:33:49AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> Add OPP tables required to scale DDR/L3 per freq-domain on SDM845
>> SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 453
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 453 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> index c036bab49fc03..8cb976118407b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> @@ -199,6 +199,12 @@
>> qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>> #cooling-cells = <2>;
>> next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
>> + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>,
>> + <&cpu0_ddr_bw_opp_table>,
>> + <&cpu0_l3_bw_opp_table>;
>> + interconnects = <&gladiator_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &mem_noc
>> SLAVE_EBI1>,
>> + <&osm_l3 MASTER_OSM_L3_APPS &osm_l3 SLAVE_OSM_L3>;
>
> This apparently depends on the 'Split SDM845 interconnect nodes and
> consolidate RPMh support' series
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=226281),
> which isn't mentioned in the cover letter.
>
> I also couldn't find a patch on the lists that adds the 'osm_l3'
> interconnect node for SDM845. The same is true for SC7180 (next
> patch of this series). These patches may be available in custom trees,
> but that isn't really helpful for upstream review.
yeah I missed adding the interconnect
refactor dependency and the nodes.
>
> I would suggest to focus on landing the dependencies of this series,
> before proceding with it (or at least most of them), there are plenty
> and without the dependencies this series isn't going to land, it also
> makes it hard for testers and reviewers to get all the pieces
yes I understand but wanted the series
out asap because since there are a few
points where we still havn't reached
a consensus on.
> together. In particular the last post of the series 'Add
> required-opps support to devfreq passive gov'
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11055499/) is from July 2019 ...
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGTfZH37ALwUHd8SpRRrBzZ6x1-++YtzS60_yRQvN-TN6rOzaA@mail.gmail.com/
The pending patch for lazy linking
was posted a while back. Now that
it has a tested-by, majority of the
series should go in since the devfreq
maintainers wanted the series pulled
in.
>
> Thanks
>
> Matthias
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists