[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1580307566.2294.4.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:19:26 -0600
From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Using matched variables in trace actions
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 2020-01-28 at 22:01 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I was debugging a histogram that wasn't working.
>
> I had the following:
>
> # cd /sys/kernel/tracing/
> # echo 'first u64 start_time u64 end_time pid_t pid u64 delta' > synthetic_events
> # echo 'hist:keys=pid:start_time=common_timestamp' > events/sched/sched_waking/trigger
> # echo 'hist:keys=next_pid:delta=common_timestamp-$start_time:onmatch(sched.sched_waking).first($start_time,common_timestamp,next_pid,$delta)' > events/sched/sched_switch/trigger
>
> Which produced:
>
Yes, this is definitely strange, and a bug. I'll root-cause it and try
to come up with a fix today. Thanks for reporting it, as well as the
workaround.
Tom
> # echo 1 > synthetic/enable
> # cat trace
> [..]
> <idle>-0 [005] d..4 342.980379: first: start_time=342980373002 end_time=197 pid=43140 delta=18446744072217752717
> <idle>-0 [000] d..4 342.980439: first: start_time=342980434369 end_time=1598 pid=44526 delta=18446744072239552512
> <idle>-0 [005] d..4 342.980495: first: start_time=342980489992 end_time=197 pid=44739 delta=18446744072217752717
> <idle>-0 [000] d..4 342.980528: first: start_time=342980525307 end_time=1598 pid=15317 delta=18446744072239552512
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 342.981176: first: start_time=342981170950 end_time=10 pid=42697 delta=18446744072217752717
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 342.985178: first: start_time=342985174789 end_time=10 pid=31097 delta=18446744072217752717
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 342.989172: first: start_time=342989168085 end_time=10 pid=30487 delta=18446744072217752717
> <idle>-0 [001] d..4 343.044173: first: start_time=343044169712 end_time=593 pid=30677 delta=18446744072217752717
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 343.358828: first: start_time=343358824790 end_time=713 pid=24892 delta=18446744072217752717
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 343.533459: first: start_time=343533455001 end_time=1466 pid=24272 delta=18446744072217752717
>
> Now, this is strange, because the end_time should not ever be 10!
>
> I added debugging and found that everything is shifted off by one.
>
> That is for
>
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 343.533459: first: start_time=343533455001 end_time=1466 pid=24272 delta=18446744072217752717
>
>
> end_time is actually 343533455001
> pid is actually 1466
> and delta is 24272
>
> Which also means that that delta that is printed is reading some random
> variable, and if you look at it in hex it's ffffffffa714f48d which
> looks to be some random pointer.
>
> Playing with this, I found that the issue is that I have $start_time in
> my parameter list for the synthetic event. But $start_time was a
> variable defined by sched_waking and not sched_switch. Although the
> references can read that variable, the synthetic parameters fail on
> that, and basically ignore it.
>
> That is, if I add start=$start_time and use $start as a parameter it
> works fine.
>
> # echo 'hist:keys=next_pid:start=$start_time,delta=common_timestamp-$start_time:onmatch(sched.sched_waking).first($start,common_timestamp,next_pid,$delta)' > events/sched/sched_switch/trigger
>
>
> # cat trace
> [...]
> <idle>-0 [001] d..4 679.668272: first: start_time=679668221531 end_time=679668266756 pid=1598 delta=45225
> <idle>-0 [006] d..4 679.668425: first: start_time=679668406777 end_time=679668420837 pid=10 delta=14060
> <idle>-0 [006] d..4 679.672431: first: start_time=679672407062 end_time=679672426696 pid=10 delta=19634
> <idle>-0 [006] d..4 679.676443: first: start_time=679676408260 end_time=679676438476 pid=10 delta=30216
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.715562: first: start_time=679715533636 end_time=679715558490 pid=713 delta=24854
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.865699: first: start_time=679865670612 end_time=679865695333 pid=1466 delta=24721
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.865775: first: start_time=679865764528 end_time=679865773007 pid=1466 delta=8479
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.865842: first: start_time=679865833406 end_time=679865840063 pid=1466 delta=6657
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.865906: first: start_time=679865898302 end_time=679865904792 pid=1466 delta=6490
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.865970: first: start_time=679865962239 end_time=679865968686 pid=1466 delta=6447
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.866034: first: start_time=679866026284 end_time=679866032651 pid=1466 delta=6367
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.866098: first: start_time=679866090264 end_time=679866096593 pid=1466 delta=6329
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.866162: first: start_time=679866154251 end_time=679866160656 pid=1466 delta=6405
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.866226: first: start_time=679866218281 end_time=679866224500 pid=1466 delta=6219
> <idle>-0 [003] d..4 679.866290: first: start_time=679866282296 end_time=679866288558 pid=1466 delta=6262
>
> But this is a bug. We either should fail the creation of the trigger,
> or we should allow it and handle it properly.
>
> -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists