lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91cdda7a-4194-ebe7-225d-854447b0436e@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:27:33 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        vipul kumar <vipulk0511@...il.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srikanth Krishnakar <Srikanth_Krishnakar@...tor.com>,
        Cedric Hombourger <Cedric_Hombourger@...tor.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Vipul Kumar <vipul_kumar@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [v3] x86/tsc: Unset TSC_KNOWN_FREQ and TSC_RELIABLE flags on
 Intel Bay Trail SoC

Hi,

On 29-01-2020 15:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 02:21:40PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 29-01-2020 14:03, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:39:28PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> writes:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>> Typical crystal frequencies are 19.2, 24 and 25Mhz.
>>>
>>> Hans, I think Cherrytrail may be affected by this as the others.
>>> CHT AFAIK uses 19.2MHz xtal.
>>
>> Are you sure?
> 
> I'm not. I may mixed this with PMC clock.

Ok, then I'm going to go with 25MHz for now.

>> The first 5 entries of the CHT MSR_FSB_FREQ documentation exactly
>> match those of the BYT documentation (which has only 5 entries),
>> which suggests to me that CHT is also using a 25 MHz crystal.
>>
>> I can also make the other CHT only frequencies when assuming a 25
>> MHz crystal, here is a bit from the patch I'm working on for this:
>>
>> /*
>>   * Cherry Trail SDM MSR_FSB_FREQ frequencies to PLL settings map:
>>   * 0000:   25 * 20 /  6  =  83.3333 MHz
>>   * 0001:   25 *  4 /  1  = 100.0000 MHz
>>   * 0010:   25 * 16 /  3  = 133.3333 MHz
>>   * 0011:   25 * 28 /  6  = 116.6667 MHz
>>   * 0100:   25 * 16 /  5  =  80.0000 MHz
>>   * 0101:   25 * 56 / 15  =  93.3333 MHz
>>   * 0110:   25 * 18 /  5  =  90.0000 MHz
>>   * 0111:   25 * 32 /  9  =  88.8889 MHz
>>   * 1000:   25 *  7 /  2  =  87.5000 MHz
>>   */
>>
>> The only one which is possibly suspicious here is this line:
>>
>>   * 0111:   25 * 32 /  9  =  88.8889 MHz
>>
>> The SDM says 88.9 MHz for this one.
> 
> Anyway it seems need to be fixed as well.
> 
> Btw, why we are mentioning 20 / 6 and 28 / 6 when arithmetically
> it's the same as 10 / 3 and 14 / 3?

I copied the BYT values from Thomas' email and I guess he did not
get around to simplifying them, I'll use the simplified versions
for my patch.

Regards,

Hans



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ