linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/104] 5.4.16-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200129153620.GA439013@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:36:20 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/104] 5.4.16-stable review

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 06:43:56AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 02:59:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.16 release.
> > There are 104 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:57:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 158 pass: 158 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 388 pass: 388 fail: 0

Wonderful, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h