[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200129171819.GB12616@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:18:19 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/28] ata: use COMMAND_LINE_SIZE for
ata_force_param_buf[] size
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 02:33:21PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Use COMMAND_LINE_SIZE instead PAGE_SIZE for ata_force_param_buf[]
> size as libata parameters buffer doesn't need to be bigger than
> the command line buffer.
>
> For many architectures this results in decreased libata-core.o
> size (COMMAND_LINE_SIZE varies from 256 to 4096 while the minimum
> PAGE_SIZE is 4096).
>
> Code size savings on m68k arch using atari_defconfig:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> before:
> 41064 4413 40 45517 b1cd drivers/ata/libata-core.o
> after:
> 41064 573 40 41677 a2cd drivers/ata/libata-core.o
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
This looks like a good start, so:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
But evne COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is quite a lot of overhead. Can we maybe add
a new Kconfig option to optionally disable the libata.force= entirely?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists