[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200129160915.4ebe0f08@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:09:14 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Cc: artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/12] tracing: Add synth_event_trace() and related
functions
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:59:27 -0600
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org> wrote:
> +static struct synth_field *find_synth_field(struct synth_event *event,
> + const char *field_name)
> +{
> + struct synth_field *field = NULL;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < event->n_fields; i++) {
> + field = event->fields[i];
> + if (strcmp(field->name, field_name) == 0)
> + return field;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
Why duplicate all theses functions and not use them in the
synth_event_trace() directly?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists