linux-kernel - [PATCH] bpf: Avoid function casting when calculating immediate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:36:58 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Avoid function casting when calculating immediate

In an effort to enable -Wcast-function-type in the top-level Makefile
to support Control Flow Integrity builds, rework the BPF instruction
immediate calculation macros to avoid mismatched function pointers. Since
these calculations are only ever between function address (these are
not function calls, just address calculations), they can be cast to u64
instead, where the result will be assigned to the s32 insn->imm.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
 include/linux/filter.h |  6 +++---
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c   |  6 +++---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c  | 21 +++++++--------------
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index f349e2c0884c..b5beee7bf2ea 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -340,8 +340,8 @@ static inline bool insn_is_zext(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 
 /* Function call */
 
-#define BPF_CAST_CALL(x)					\
-		((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64))(x))
+#define BPF_FUNC_IMM(FUNC)					\
+		((u64)(FUNC) - (u64)__bpf_call_base)
 
 #define BPF_EMIT_CALL(FUNC)					\
 	((struct bpf_insn) {					\
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static inline bool insn_is_zext(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 		.dst_reg = 0,					\
 		.src_reg = 0,					\
 		.off   = 0,					\
-		.imm   = ((FUNC) - __bpf_call_base) })
+		.imm   = BPF_FUNC_IMM(FUNC) })
 
 /* Raw code statement block */
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index 2d182c4ee9d9..325656a61708 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static u32 htab_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(&__htab_map_lookup_elem,
 		     (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL));
-	*insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem));
+	*insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem);
 	*insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 1);
 	*insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, ret,
 				offsetof(struct htab_elem, key) +
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static u32 htab_lru_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map,
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(&__htab_map_lookup_elem,
 		     (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL));
-	*insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem));
+	*insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem);
 	*insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 4);
 	*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, ref_reg, ret,
 			      offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node) +
@@ -1749,7 +1749,7 @@ static u32 htab_of_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map,
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(&__htab_map_lookup_elem,
 		     (void *(*)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key))NULL));
-	*insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem));
+	*insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(__htab_map_lookup_elem);
 	*insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 2);
 	*insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, ret,
 				offsetof(struct htab_elem, key) +
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1cc945daa9c8..70b4e47c2214 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9054,8 +9054,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			    insn->src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
 				continue;
 			subprog = insn->off;
-			insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(func[subprog]->bpf_func) -
-				    __bpf_call_base;
+			insn->imm = BPF_FUNC_IMM(func[subprog]->bpf_func);
 		}
 
 		/* we use the aux data to keep a list of the start addresses
@@ -9429,28 +9428,22 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 
 			switch (insn->imm) {
 			case BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem:
-				insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_lookup_elem) -
-					    __bpf_call_base;
+				insn->imm = BPF_FUNC_IMM(ops->map_lookup_elem);
 				continue;
 			case BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem:
-				insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_update_elem) -
-					    __bpf_call_base;
+				insn->imm = BPF_FUNC_IMM(ops->map_update_elem);
 				continue;
 			case BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem:
-				insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_delete_elem) -
-					    __bpf_call_base;
+				insn->imm = BPF_FUNC_IMM(ops->map_delete_elem);
 				continue;
 			case BPF_FUNC_map_push_elem:
-				insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_push_elem) -
-					    __bpf_call_base;
+				insn->imm = BPF_FUNC_IMM(ops->map_push_elem);
 				continue;
 			case BPF_FUNC_map_pop_elem:
-				insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_pop_elem) -
-					    __bpf_call_base;
+				insn->imm = BPF_FUNC_IMM(ops->map_pop_elem);
 				continue;
 			case BPF_FUNC_map_peek_elem:
-				insn->imm = BPF_CAST_CALL(ops->map_peek_elem) -
-					    __bpf_call_base;
+				insn->imm = BPF_FUNC_IMM(ops->map_peek_elem);
 				continue;
 			}
 
-- 
2.20.1


-- 
Kees Cook