linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 63/92] libertas: Fix two buffer overflows at parsing bss descriptor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200129224719.GA4342@amd>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 23:47:19 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Wen Huang <huangwenabc@...il.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 63/92] libertas: Fix two buffer overflows at parsing
 bss descriptor

Hi!

> From: Wen Huang <huangwenabc@...il.com>
> 
> commit e5e884b42639c74b5b57dc277909915c0aefc8bb upstream.

> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/cfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/cfg.c
> @@ -1717,6 +1721,9 @@ static int lbs_ibss_join_existing(struct
>  	struct cmd_ds_802_11_ad_hoc_join cmd;
>  	u8 preamble = RADIO_PREAMBLE_SHORT;
>  	int ret = 0;
> +	int hw, i;
> +	u8 rates_max;
> +	u8 *rates;
>  
>  	/* TODO: set preamble based on scan result */
>  	ret = lbs_set_radio(priv, preamble, 1);
> @@ -1775,9 +1782,12 @@ static int lbs_ibss_join_existing(struct
>  	if (!rates_eid) {
>  		lbs_add_rates(cmd.bss.rates);
>  	} else {
> -		int hw, i;
> -		u8 rates_max = rates_eid[1];
> -		u8 *rates = cmd.bss.rates;
> +		rates_max = rates_eid[1];

I believe original version (with variables being local to the else)
was better.

> +		if (rates_max > MAX_RATES) {
> +			lbs_deb_join("invalid rates");
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		rates = cmd.bss.rates;

"goto out" goes to "return ret". ret will be 0 at this point, so this
will return success. I don't think that's right.

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)