linux-kernel - [PATCH 03/26] KVM: x86: Snapshot MSR index in a local variable when processing lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200129234640.8147-4-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:46:17 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/26] KVM: x86: Snapshot MSR index in a local variable when processing lists

Snapshot the MSR index when processing the virtualized and emulated MSR
lists in kvm_init_msr_list() to improve code readability, particularly
in the RTIT and PerfMon MSR checks.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 24597526b5de..3d4a5326d84e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5214,7 +5214,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
 {
 	struct x86_pmu_capability x86_pmu;
-	u32 dummy[2];
+	u32 dummy[2], msr_index;
 	unsigned i;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(INTEL_PMC_MAX_FIXED != 4,
@@ -5227,14 +5227,16 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
 	num_msr_based_features = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msrs_to_save_all); i++) {
-		if (rdmsr_safe(msrs_to_save_all[i], &dummy[0], &dummy[1]) < 0)
+		msr_index = msrs_to_save_all[i];
+
+		if (rdmsr_safe(msr_index, &dummy[0], &dummy[1]) < 0)
 			continue;
 
 		/*
 		 * Even MSRs that are valid in the host may not be exposed
 		 * to the guests in some cases.
 		 */
-		switch (msrs_to_save_all[i]) {
+		switch (msr_index) {
 		case MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS:
 			if (!kvm_mpx_supported())
 				continue;
@@ -5262,17 +5264,17 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
 			break;
 		case MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A ... MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR3_B:
 			if (!kvm_x86_ops->pt_supported() ||
-				msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A >=
+				msr_index - MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A >=
 				intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges) * 2)
 				continue;
 			break;
 		case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 ... MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 + 17:
-			if (msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
+			if (msr_index - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
 			    min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, x86_pmu.num_counters_gp))
 				continue;
 			break;
 		case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 ... MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + 17:
-			if (msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 >=
+			if (msr_index - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 >=
 			    min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, x86_pmu.num_counters_gp))
 				continue;
 			break;
@@ -5280,14 +5282,16 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
 			break;
 		}
 
-		msrs_to_save[num_msrs_to_save++] = msrs_to_save_all[i];
+		msrs_to_save[num_msrs_to_save++] = msr_index;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(emulated_msrs_all); i++) {
-		if (!kvm_x86_ops->has_emulated_msr(emulated_msrs_all[i]))
+		msr_index = emulated_msrs_all[i];
+
+		if (!kvm_x86_ops->has_emulated_msr(msr_index))
 			continue;
 
-		emulated_msrs[num_emulated_msrs++] = emulated_msrs_all[i];
+		emulated_msrs[num_emulated_msrs++] = msr_index;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msr_based_features_all); i++) {
-- 
2.24.1