[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200130083927.GH2208@ninjato>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 09:39:27 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
pierre-yves.mordret@...com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fabrice.gasnier@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] i2c: i2c-stm32f7: allow controller to be
wakeup-source
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 02:28:33PM +0100, Alain Volmat wrote:
> Allow the i2c-stm32f7 controller to become a wakeup-source
> of the system. In such case, when a slave is registered to the
> I2C controller, receiving a I2C message targeting that registered
> slave address wakes up the suspended system.
>
> In order to be able to wake-up, the I2C controller DT node
> must have the property wakeup-source defined and a slave
> must be registered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...com>
Applied to for-next, thanks!
> +static void stm32f7_i2c_enable_wakeup(struct stm32f7_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
> + bool enable)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = i2c_dev->base;
> + u32 mask = STM32F7_I2C_CR1_WUPEN;
...
I wondered why we can't move this more up to avoid the forward
declaration?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists