[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200130001023.24339-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:10:18 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: Move x86 init ops to separate struct
The non-x86 part of this series is wholly contained in patch 01. Compared
to other recent kvm-wide changes, this one is very straightforward (famous
last words).
Like a few other architectures, e.g. PPC, x86 uses a set of global hooks
to call back into vendor code on demand. A handlful of the x86 hooks are
used only within the scope of kvm_init(). This series moves the init-only
hooks to a separate struct, partly to clean up the code a bit, but mainly
so that the runtime hooks can be made available only after the x86 vendor
has completed its ->hardware_setup(). While working on a different series
I spent a fair bit of time scratching my as to why a kvm_x86_ops wasn't
working, and eventually realized VMX's callback wasn't "ready" because the
vmcs_config hadn't yet been populated.
Due to lack of a cross-compiling setup, the non-x86 changes in patch 01
are untested.
The SVM changes in patch 02 are fairly well tested, e.g. fudged things
enough to ensure KVM didn't explode on a null pointer.
Patch 05 is a bit scary as a rogue dereference of kvm_x86_ops before
->hardware_setup() will crash KVM (maybe the kernel?). I didn't find any
obvious ways to use kvm_x86_ops on AMD, and tested on a few different
Intel CPUs, so I'm reasonably confident that there are no existing
violations.
Sean Christopherson (5):
KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque param to additional arch funcs
KVM: x86: Move init-only kvm_x86_ops to separate struct
KVM: VMX: Move hardware_setup() definition below vmx_x86_ops
KVM: VMX: Configure runtime hooks using vmx_x86_ops
KVM: x86: Set kvm_x86_ops only after ->hardware_setup() completes
arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 4 +-
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 4 +-
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 13 +-
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 15 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 15 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h | 3 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 345 ++++++++++++++++----------------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 +-
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 4 +-
virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 4 +-
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 18 +-
12 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 207 deletions(-)
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists