[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200130165425.GA8872@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 08:54:25 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] splice: direct call for default_file_splice*()
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:49:46PM +0300, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Indirect calls could be very expensive nowadays, so try to use direct calls
> whenever possible.
... and independent of that your new version is much shorter and easier
to read. But it could be improved a tiny little bit further:
> if (out->f_op->splice_write)
> - splice_write = out->f_op->splice_write;
> + return out->f_op->splice_write(pipe, out, ppos, len, flags);
> else
> - splice_write = default_file_splice_write;
> -
> - return splice_write(pipe, out, ppos, len, flags);
> + return default_file_splice_write(pipe, out, ppos, len, flags);
No need for the else after an return.
> if (in->f_op->splice_read)
> - splice_read = in->f_op->splice_read;
> + return in->f_op->splice_read(in, ppos, pipe, len, flags);
> else
> - splice_read = default_file_splice_read;
> -
> - return splice_read(in, ppos, pipe, len, flags);
> + return default_file_splice_read(in, ppos, pipe, len, flags);
Same here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists