[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200130042126.ahkik6ffb5vnzdim@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 09:51:26 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] OPP: Improve require-opps linking
On 29-01-20, 19:04, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> I don't have a gen-pd use case to test against but with the is_genpd
> check removed it works as expected when I used it against this
> series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11353185/
>
> In the lazy_link_required_opps fn shouldn't we skip the dynamic
> opps in the the opp list?
Tables with dynamic OPPs should not be there in pending_opp_tables
list and so that function shall never get called for them.
> With ^^ addressed:
> Reviewed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
> Tested-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Thanks Sibi.
@Saravana: Can you please give your feedback as well? I don't want to
push something that may end up breaking something else :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists