linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 103/110] rsi: fix non-atomic allocation in completion handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200130183625.791081129@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jan 2020 19:39:19 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Prameela Rani Garnepudi <prameela.j04cs@...il.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 103/110] rsi: fix non-atomic allocation in completion handler

From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>

commit b9b9f9fea21830f85cf0148cd8dce001ae55ead1 upstream.

USB completion handlers are called in atomic context and must
specifically not allocate memory using GFP_KERNEL.

Fixes: a1854fae1414 ("rsi: improve RX packet handling in USB interface")
Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.17
Cc: Prameela Rani Garnepudi <prameela.j04cs@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_usb.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_usb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_usb.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
 #include <net/rsi_91x.h>
 #include "rsi_usb.h"
 #include "rsi_hal.h"
@@ -29,7 +30,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(dev_oper_mode,
 		 "9[Wi-Fi STA + BT LE], 13[Wi-Fi STA + BT classic + BT LE]\n"
 		 "6[AP + BT classic], 14[AP + BT classic + BT LE]");
 
-static int rsi_rx_urb_submit(struct rsi_hw *adapter, u8 ep_num);
+static int rsi_rx_urb_submit(struct rsi_hw *adapter, u8 ep_num, gfp_t flags);
 
 /**
  * rsi_usb_card_write() - This function writes to the USB Card.
@@ -285,7 +286,7 @@ static void rsi_rx_done_handler(struct u
 	status = 0;
 
 out:
-	if (rsi_rx_urb_submit(dev->priv, rx_cb->ep_num))
+	if (rsi_rx_urb_submit(dev->priv, rx_cb->ep_num, GFP_ATOMIC))
 		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "%s: Failed in urb submission", __func__);
 
 	if (status)
@@ -307,7 +308,7 @@ static void rsi_rx_urb_kill(struct rsi_h
  *
  * Return: 0 on success, a negative error code on failure.
  */
-static int rsi_rx_urb_submit(struct rsi_hw *adapter, u8 ep_num)
+static int rsi_rx_urb_submit(struct rsi_hw *adapter, u8 ep_num, gfp_t mem_flags)
 {
 	struct rsi_91x_usbdev *dev = (struct rsi_91x_usbdev *)adapter->rsi_dev;
 	struct rx_usb_ctrl_block *rx_cb = &dev->rx_cb[ep_num - 1];
@@ -337,7 +338,7 @@ static int rsi_rx_urb_submit(struct rsi_
 			  rsi_rx_done_handler,
 			  rx_cb);
 
-	status = usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_KERNEL);
+	status = usb_submit_urb(urb, mem_flags);
 	if (status) {
 		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "%s: Failed in urb submission\n", __func__);
 		dev_kfree_skb(skb);
@@ -827,12 +828,12 @@ static int rsi_probe(struct usb_interfac
 		rsi_dbg(INIT_ZONE, "%s: Device Init Done\n", __func__);
 	}
 
-	status = rsi_rx_urb_submit(adapter, WLAN_EP);
+	status = rsi_rx_urb_submit(adapter, WLAN_EP, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (status)
 		goto err1;
 
 	if (adapter->priv->coex_mode > 1) {
-		status = rsi_rx_urb_submit(adapter, BT_EP);
+		status = rsi_rx_urb_submit(adapter, BT_EP, GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (status)
 			goto err_kill_wlan_urb;
 	}