lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:02:37 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Convert a use of sprintf to snprintf in
 console_unlock

On (20/01/30 15:16), Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> When CONFIG_PRINTK is disabled (e.g. when building allnoconfig), clang
> warns:
> 
> ../kernel/printk/printk.c:2416:10: warning: 'sprintf' will always
> overflow; destination buffer has size 0, but format string expands to at
> least 33 [-Wfortify-source]
>                         len = sprintf(text,
>                               ^
> 1 warning generated.
> 
> It is not wrong; text has a zero size when CONFIG_PRINTK is disabled
> because LOG_LINE_MAX and PREFIX_MAX are both zero. Change to snprintf so
> that this case is explicitly handled without any risk of overflow.

We probably can add a note here that for !CONFIG_PRINTK builds
logbuf overflow is very unlikely.

Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ