linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 11/16] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Keep clock enabled only during of DMA transfer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1b7dd052-20f0-7b38-9578-44967eca1770@nvidia.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:05:41 +0000
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
CC:     <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/16] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Keep clock enabled only
 during of DMA transfer


On 30/01/2020 04:37, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> It's a bit impractical to enable hardware's clock at the time of DMA
> channel's allocation because most of DMA client drivers allocate DMA
> channel at the time of the driver's probing, and thus, DMA clock is kept
> always-enabled in practice, defeating the whole purpose of runtime PM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
> index 22b88ccff05d..0ee28d8e3c96 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
> @@ -436,6 +436,8 @@ static void tegra_dma_stop(struct tegra_dma_channel *tdc)
>  		tdc_write(tdc, TEGRA_APBDMA_CHAN_STATUS, status);
>  	}
>  	tdc->busy = false;
> +
> +	pm_runtime_put(tdc->tdma->dev);

There are only 3 places where tegra_dma_stop is called, does it simplify
the code if we move the pm_runtime_put() outside of tegra_dma_stop? In
other words, everywhere there is a tegra_dma_stop, afterwards we then
call pm_runtime_put?

This would allow us to get rid of the extra pm_runtime_get in
terminate_all.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic