[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200131021909.GC18575@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 13:19:09 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] fuse: Convert from readpages to readahead
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:35:33PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:08:29PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 05:35:52PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > + while (nr_pages--) {
> > > + struct page *page = readahead_page(mapping, start++);
> > > + int err = fuse_readpages_fill(&data, page);
> > > +
> > > + if (!err)
> > > + continue;
> > > + nr_pages++;
> > > + goto out;
> > > }
> >
> > That's some pretty convoluted logic. Perhaps:
> >
> > for (; nr_pages > 0 ; nr_pages--) {
> > struct page *page = readahead_page(mapping, start++);
> >
> > if (fuse_readpages_fill(&data, page))
> > goto out;
> > }
>
> I have a bit of an aversion to that style of for loop ... I like this
> instead:
>
> while (nr_pages) {
> struct page *page = readahead_page(mapping, start++);
>
> if (fuse_readpages_fill(&data, page) != 0)
> goto out;
> nr_pages--;
> }
yup, that's also fine.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists