linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 5/8] ima: allocate and initialize tfm for each PCR bank

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <17b00b78aa2249f19ba376c7613cfb38@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jan 2020 13:42:13 +0000
From:   Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com" <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com" 
        <james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Silviu Vlasceanu <Silviu.Vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/8] ima: allocate and initialize tfm for each PCR bank

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-integrity-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mimi Zohar
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 1:19 PM
> To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>;
> jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com;
> james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com; linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> Silviu Vlasceanu <Silviu.Vlasceanu@...wei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] ima: allocate and initialize tfm for each PCR bank
> 
> On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 18:04 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > This patch creates a crypto_shash structure for each allocated PCR bank
> and
> > for SHA1 if a bank with that algorithm is not currently allocated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > +int __init ima_init_crypto(void)
> > +{
> > +	enum hash_algo algo;
> > +	long rc;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	rc = ima_init_ima_crypto();
> > +	if (rc)
> > +		return rc;
> > +
> > +	ima_algo_array = kmalloc_array(ima_tpm_chip-
> >nr_allocated_banks + 1,
> > +				       sizeof(*ima_algo_array), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> Perhaps instead of hard coding "nr_allocated_banks + 1", create a
> variable for storing the number of "extra" banks.  Walk the banks
> setting ima_sha1_idx and, later, in a subsequent patch set
> ima_hash_algo_idx.

I could store the indexes in an array and add ARRAY_SIZE of that array.

> > +	if (!ima_algo_array) {
> > +		rc = -ENOMEM;
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks + 1; i++) {
> > +		ima_algo_array[i].tfm = NULL;
> > +		ima_algo_array[i].algo = HASH_ALGO__LAST;
> > +	}
> 
> ima_init_crypto() is executed once on initialization.  I'm not sure if
> it makes a difference, but if you're really concerned about an
> additional loop, the initialization, here, could be limited to the
> "extra" banks.  The other banks could be initialized at the beginning
> of the next loop.

I set algo to HASH_ALGO__LAST to mark the ima_algo_array entries as
uninitialized. ima_alloc_tfm() uses ima_algo_array in the next loop.
Replacing kmalloc_array() with kcalloc() would cause algo to be set to
HASH_ALGO_MD4.

I could check tfm first, which ensures that also algo was initialized.

Roberto

> > +	ima_sha1_idx = -1;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) {
> > +		algo = ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks[i].crypto_id;
> > +		ima_algo_array[i].algo = algo;
> > +
> > +		/* unknown TPM algorithm */
> > +		if (algo == HASH_ALGO__LAST)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA1)
> > +			ima_sha1_idx = i;
> > +
> > +		if (algo == ima_hash_algo) {
> > +			ima_algo_array[i].tfm = ima_shash_tfm;
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		ima_algo_array[i].tfm = ima_alloc_tfm(algo);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(ima_algo_array[i].tfm)) {
> > +			if (algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA1) {
> > +				rc = PTR_ERR(ima_algo_array[i].tfm);
> > +				ima_algo_array[i].tfm = NULL;
> > +				goto out_array;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			ima_algo_array[i].tfm = NULL;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (ima_sha1_idx < 0) {
> > +		ima_algo_array[i].tfm = ima_alloc_tfm(HASH_ALGO_SHA1);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(ima_algo_array[i].tfm)) {
> > +			rc = PTR_ERR(ima_algo_array[i].tfm);
> > +			goto out_array;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		ima_sha1_idx = i;
> > +		ima_algo_array[i].algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +out_array:
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ima_tpm_chip->nr_allocated_banks + 1; i++) {
> > +		if (!ima_algo_array[i].tfm ||
> > +		    ima_algo_array[i].tfm == ima_shash_tfm)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		crypto_free_shash(ima_algo_array[i].tfm);
> > +	}
> > +out:
> > +	crypto_free_shash(ima_shash_tfm);
> > +	return rc;
> > +}