[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKfA+yPHiL4R7-jkewwhDgM6jkwhW5o9H=VL9CnyBikhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:42:28 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-debug: dynamic allocation of hash table
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 4:30 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>
> ...and when that represents ~5% of the total system RAM it is a *lot*
> less reasonable than even 12KB. As I said, it's great to make a debug
> option more efficient such that what it observes is more representative
> of the non-debug behaviour, but it mustn't come at the cost of making
> the entire option unworkable for other users.
>
Then I suggest you send a patch to reduce PREALLOC_DMA_DEBUG_ENTRIES
because having 65536 preallocated entries consume 4 MB of memory.
Actually this whole attempt to re-implement slab allocations in this
file is suspect.
Do not get me wrong, but if you really want to run linux on a 16MB host,
I guess you need to add CONFIG_BASE_SMALL all over the places,
not only in this kernel/dma/debug.c file.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists