[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200131154735.GA4520@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:47:35 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, shakeelb@...gle.com, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Allocate shrinker_map on appropriate NUMA node
On Fri 31-01-20 18:00:51, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
[...]
> @@ -333,8 +333,9 @@ static int memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> /* Not yet online memcg */
> if (!old)
> return 0;
> -
> - new = kvmalloc(sizeof(*new) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + /* See comment in alloc_mem_cgroup_per_node_info()*/
> + tmp = node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) ? nid : NUMA_NO_NODE;
> + new = kvmalloc_node(sizeof(*new) + size, GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
> if (!new)
> return -ENOMEM;
I do not think this is a good pattern to copy. Why cannot you simply use
kvmalloc_node with the given node? The allocator should fallback to the
closest node if the given one doesn't have any memory.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists