[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFcVEC+sg++cQuB-tEzC4DDgYwd1nTHyA=R7CGkrjCOCAbkroQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 21:44:20 +0530
From: Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
Cc: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@...inx.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: macb: Limit maximum GEM TX length in TSO
Hi Claudiu,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 8:27 PM <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 31.01.2020 12:27, Harini Katakam wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > GEM_MAX_TX_LEN currently resolves to 0x3FF8 for any IP version supporting
> > TSO with full 14bits of length field in payload descriptor. But an IP
> > errata causes false amba_error (bit 6 of ISR) when length in payload
> > descriptors is specified above 16387. The error occurs because the DMA
> > falsely concludes that there is not enough space in SRAM for incoming
> > payload. These errors were observed continuously under stress of large
> > packets using iperf on a version where SRAM was 16K for each queue. This
> > errata will be documented shortly and affects all versions since TSO
> > functionality was added. Hence limit the max length to 0x3FC0 (rounded).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@...inx.com>
> > ---
<snip>
> > - bp->max_tx_length = GEM_MAX_TX_LEN;
> > + bp->max_tx_length = min(GEM_MAX_TX_LEN, GEM_MAX_TX_LEN_ERRATA);
>
> Isn't this always resolved to GEM_MAX_TX_LEN_ERRATA?
Sorry, yes it does. I accidentally concluded that this was
version specific. Will just default to 0x3fc0 in v2.
Thanks for the review.
Regards,
Harini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists