[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod6H4thR6_Ky9Qhj4+U2S7i94ed6adpTXorPgZawkiAcGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:22:55 -0800
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Allocate shrinker_map on appropriate NUMA node
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 8:09 AM Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
>
> mm: Allocate shrinker_map on appropriate NUMA node
>
> From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
>
> Despite shrinker_map may be touched from any cpu
> (e.g., a bit there may be set by a task running
> everywhere); kswapd is always bound to specific
> node. So, we will allocate shrinker_map from
> related NUMA node to respect its NUMA locality.
> Also, this follows generic way we use for allocation
> memcg's per-node data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists