linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] locking: Percpu-rwsem rewrite

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:23:06 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
        will@...nel.org
Cc:     oleg@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...hat.com, williams@...hat.com,
        bristot@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, jack@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] locking: Percpu-rwsem rewrite

On 1/31/20 10:07 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the long awaited report of the percpu-rwsem rework (sorry Juri).
>
> IIRC (I really have trouble keeping up momentum on this series) I've addressed
> all previous comments by Oleg and Davidlohr and Waiman and hope we can stick
> this in tip/locking/core for inclusion in the next merge.
>
> It has been cooked (thoroughly) in PREEMPT_RT, and not found wanting.
>
> Any objections to me stuffing it in so we can all forget about it properly?
>
>
The patchset looks good to me.

Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>

Cheers,
Longman