[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200131205237.29535-2-sj38.park@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 21:52:33 +0100
From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To: corbet@....net, paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] docs/locking: Fix outdated section names
From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
Commit 2e4f5382d12a ("locking/doc: Rename LOCK/UNLOCK to
ACQUIRE/RELEASE") has not appied to 'spinlock.rst'. This commit updates
the doc for the change.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
---
Documentation/locking/spinlocks.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/locking/spinlocks.rst b/Documentation/locking/spinlocks.rst
index 66e3792f8a36..bec96f7a9f2d 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/spinlocks.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/spinlocks.rst
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ worry about UP vs SMP issues: the spinlocks work correctly under both.
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
- (5) LOCK operations.
+ (5) ACQUIRE operations.
- (6) UNLOCK operations.
+ (6) RELEASE operations.
The above is usually pretty simple (you usually need and want only one
spinlock for most things - using more than one spinlock can make things a
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists