linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH ghak25 v2 8/9] netfilter: add audit operation field

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSuX-f8c-yoph4UB=sHXVuuDLPzRWs19=OVrY+9TBRjkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:18:29 -0500
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
        Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, sgrubb@...hat.com,
        omosnace@...hat.com, twoerner@...hat.com,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        tgraf@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak25 v2 8/9] netfilter: add audit operation field

On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:23 PM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
> > index 96cabb095eed..5eab4d898c26 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/audit.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
> > @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ extern int __audit_log_bprm_fcaps(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
> >  extern void __audit_fanotify(unsigned int response);
> >  extern void __audit_tk_injoffset(struct timespec64 offset);
> >  extern void __audit_ntp_log(const struct audit_ntp_data *ad);
> > -extern void __audit_nf_cfg(const char *name, u8 af, int nentries);
> > +extern void __audit_nf_cfg(const char *name, u8 af, int nentries, int op);
>
> Consider adding an enum instead of int op.
>
> >       if (audit_enabled)
> > -             audit_nf_cfg(repl->name, AF_BRIDGE, repl->nentries);
> > +             audit_nf_cfg(repl->name, AF_BRIDGE, repl->nentries, 1);
>
> audit_nf_cfg(repl->name, AF_BRIDGE, repl->nentries, AUDIT_XT_OP_REPLACE);
>
> ... would be a bit more readable than '1'.
>
> The name is just an example, you can pick something else.

I agree.  Also, please just merge this into patch 4; I don't see a
solid reason why it shouldn't be there.

--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com