lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:22:27 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] add persistent submission state

On 1/31/20 3:15 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Apart from unrelated first patch, this persues two goals:
> 
> 1. start preparing io_uring to move resources handling into
> opcode specific functions
> 
> 2. make the first step towards long-standing optimisation ideas
> 
> Basically, it makes struct io_submit_state embedded into ctx, so
> easily accessible and persistent, and then plays a bit around that.

Do you have any perf/latency numbers for this? Just curious if we
see any improvements on that front, cross submit persistence of
alloc caches should be a nice sync win, for example, or even
for peak iops by not having to replenish the pool for each batch.

I can try and run some here too.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ