lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d36a817-5519-8496-17cf-00eda5ed4ec7@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:53:43 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     sjpark@...zon.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, shuah@...nel.org,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sj38.park@...il.com,
        aams@...zon.com, SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tcp: Reduce SYN resend delay if a suspicous ACK is
 received



On 1/31/20 2:11 PM, Neal Cardwell wrote:

> I looked into fixing this, but my quick reading of the Linux
> tcp_rcv_state_process() code is that it should behave correctly and
> that a connection in FIN_WAIT_1 that receives a FIN/ACK should move to
> TIME_WAIT.
> 
> SeongJae, do you happen to have a tcpdump trace of the problematic
> sequence where the "process A" ends up in FIN_WAIT_2 when it should be
> in TIME_WAIT?
> 
> If I have time I will try to construct a packetdrill case to verify
> the behavior in this case.

Unfortunately you wont be able to reproduce the issue with packetdrill,
since it involved packets being processed at the same time (race window)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ